Estimating the economic benefits of maintaining peak instream flows in the Poudre River through Fort Collins, Colorado
(eBook)

Book Cover
Average Rating

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Copies In Prospector

Loading Prospector Copies...

More Details

Published
[Fort Collins, Colo.] : [Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, [2008].
Format
eBook
Language
English

Notes

General Note
"Final Report, March 24, 2008."-- Title page.
General Note
"April 2008." -- Cover
Bibliography
Bibliographical references: pages 39-40.
Description
The economic benefits to a random sample of Fort Collins residents were estimated using a simulated market method recommended for use by federal agencies including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The mail survey asked households if they would pay to avoid a 50% reduction in peak spring and summer flows. Slightly more than two-thirds of respondents thought such a reduction in flows was a very bad change, with an additional 15% stating it was somewhat a bad change. Thus over 80% of residents think the 50% reduction in flows is a bad change. Overall, this analysis indicates a substantial economic value to visiting and non-visiting Fort Collins households to maintain current peak spring and summer flows in the Poudre River. It appears the value of these instream flows to Fort Collins residents is of the same magnitude as the market value of the water in alternative uses.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Loomis, J. B. (2008). Estimating the economic benefits of maintaining peak instream flows in the Poudre River through Fort Collins, Colorado . [Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Loomis, John B. 2008. Estimating the Economic Benefits of Maintaining Peak Instream Flows in the Poudre River Through Fort Collins, Colorado. [Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Loomis, John B. Estimating the Economic Benefits of Maintaining Peak Instream Flows in the Poudre River Through Fort Collins, Colorado [Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2008.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Loomis, John B. Estimating the Economic Benefits of Maintaining Peak Instream Flows in the Poudre River Through Fort Collins, Colorado [Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2008.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Grouped Work ID
4e5b496a-a5e1-d2e5-9950-44a39daac5c3-eng
Go To Grouped Work

Grouping Information

Grouped Work ID4e5b496a-a5e1-d2e5-9950-44a39daac5c3-eng
Full titleestimating the economic benefits of maintaining peak instream flows in the poudre river through fort collins colorado
Authorloomis john b
Grouping Categorybook
Last Update2022-06-13 10:33:16AM
Last Indexed2024-04-27 00:57:03AM

Book Cover Information

Image Sourcedefault
First LoadedJun 23, 2022
Last UsedApr 26, 2024

Marc Record

First DetectedJun 15, 2020 12:00:00 AM
Last File Modification TimeJul 31, 2021 08:31:08 AM

MARC Record

LEADER02845nam a2200469Ii 4500
001on1158316029
003OCoLC
00520200615015714.0
006m     o  d s      
007cr |||||||||||
008200615s2008    coua    ob   s000 0 eng d
035 |a (OCoLC)1158316029
040 |a DDB|b eng|e rda|c DDB|d UtOrBLW
043 |a n-us-co
049 |a DDBA
086 |a UCSU5/2.2/B43/2008/INTERNET
086 |a UCSU5/2.2/B43/2008/INTERNET|2 codocs
1001 |a Loomis, John B.
24510|a Estimating the economic benefits of maintaining peak instream flows in the Poudre River through Fort Collins, Colorado|h [electronic resource] /|c John Loomis.
24617|a January 2008 Economic development report, no. 2
264 1|a [Fort Collins, Colo.] :|b [Colorado State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,|c [2008]
300 |a 1 online resource (41 pages) :|b illustrations
336 |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent
337 |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia
338 |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier
347 |a text file|2 rdaft
500 |a "Final Report, March 24, 2008."-- Title page.
500 |a "April 2008." -- Cover
504 |a Bibliographical references: pages 39-40.
520 |a The economic benefits to a random sample of Fort Collins residents were estimated using a simulated market method recommended for use by federal agencies including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The mail survey asked households if they would pay to avoid a 50% reduction in peak spring and summer flows. Slightly more than two-thirds of respondents thought such a reduction in flows was a very bad change, with an additional 15% stating it was somewhat a bad change. Thus over 80% of residents think the 50% reduction in flows is a bad change. Overall, this analysis indicates a substantial economic value to visiting and non-visiting Fort Collins households to maintain current peak spring and summer flows in the Poudre River. It appears the value of these instream flows to Fort Collins residents is of the same magnitude as the market value of the water in alternative uses.
588 |a Online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed June 2020)
650 0|a Fishing|x Economic aspects|z Colorado.
650 0|a Rafting (Sports)|x Economic aspects|z Colorado.
650 0|a Streamflow|x Economic aspects|z Colorado.
650 0|a Tourism|z Colorado.
7102 |a Colorado State University.|b Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
85641|u http://hdl.handle.net/11629/co:33416_ucsu522b432008internet.pdf|z Access online
907 |a .b10690190|b 10-24-20|c 06-15-20
945 |g 1|j 0|l csdig|o -|p $0.00|q -|r -|s j |t 0|u 0|v 0|w 0|x 0|y .i11914282|z 06-15-20
994 |a C0|b DDB
998 |a cs|b 06-15-20|c m|d a |e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 0
998 |a cs|b 06-15-20|c m|d a |e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 1